From WikiChip
Bonnell - Intel
< intel‎ | microarchitectures
Revision as of 16:48, 7 April 2016 by At32Hz (talk | contribs) (Pipeline)

Edit Values
Bonnell µarch
General Info
ERROR: "atype" is missing!

Bonnell was a microarchitecture for Intel's 45 nm ultra-low power microprocessors first introduced in 2008 for their then-new Atom family. Bonnell, which was named after the highest point in Austin - Mount Bonnell, was Intel's first x86-compatible microarchitecture designed to target the ultra-low power market.

Architecture

Bonnell's primary goals were:

  1. Reduce power consumption,
  2. while staying fully x86-compatible,
  3. at acceptable performance

Performance/Power new rule: +1% performance for at most +1% power consumption.

Memory Hierarchy

  • Cache
    • Hardware prefetchers
    • L1 Cache:
      • 32 KB 8-way set associative instruction
        • 1 read and 1 write port
      • 24 KB 6-way set associative data
        • 1 read and 1 write port
      • Per core
    • L2 Cache:
      • 512 KB 8-way set associative
      • ECC
      • Shrinkable from 512 KB to 128 KB (2-way)
      • Per core
    • L3 Cache:
      • No level 3 cache
    • RAM
      • Maximum of 2 GB, 4 GB, and 8 GB

Note that the L1 cache for data and instructions were originally both 32 KB (8-way), however due to power restrictions, the L1d$ was later reduced to 24 KB.

Functional Units

The number of functional units were kept to minimum to cut on power consumption.

  • 2 Integer ALUs (1 for jumps, 1 for shifts)
  • 2 FP ALUs (1 adder, 1 for others)
  • No Integer multiplier & divider

Pipeline

Much like other x86 microarchitectures, Bonnell converts the complex instructions into finer micro-ops. Bonnell has a 16-stage pipeline with a 13-stage miss penalty. Bonnell is a dual-issue superscalar but with in-order execution (in fact, first microarchitecture since Pentium Pro to not feature a OoOE). The elimination of reordering logic allowed for lower power consumption and small die area. This does imply the overall MPU is less efficient in managing its own resources; memory accesses and FP operations also stall the whole pipeline. Bonnell employed Safe Instruction Recognition (SIR) and Simultaneous multithreading (SMT) to bring performance to acceptable level. Intel claimed sub-20% power consumption penalty while improving performance between 30% and 50%.

  • Instruction Fetch
    • 3 stages
    • 8 Bytes/Cycle (lower if SMT)
  • Instruction Decode
    • 3 stages
    • Instructions with up to 3 prefixes/Cycle
  • Instruction Dispatch
    • 2 stages
  • Source Operand Read
  • Data Cache Access
    • 3 stages
      • 1 stage for calculating
      • 2 stages for reading cache
  • Execution
    • 2 clusters
      • integers
        • quick cache access due to direct connection
      • floating point & SIMD
  • Exception & MT Handling
    • 2 stages
  • Commit
    • 1 stage

Cores

First generation of Bonnel-based microprocessors introduced 2 cores: Silverthorne for ultra-mobile PCs and mobile Internet devices (MIDs) and Diamondville for ultra cheap notebooks and desktops.

Silverthorne

Main article: Silverthorne

Silverthorne was the codename for a series of ultra-mobile PCs introduced in 2008.

Key features:

  • 32-bit
  • 1 Core / 2 Threads
  • FSB 400 MHz - 533 MHz
  • Cache
    • 32 KB L1i$ / 23 KB L1d$
    • 512 KB L2$
    • No L3$

Diamondville

Main article: Diamondville

Diamondville was the codename for the series of ultra cheap notebooks and desktops introduced in 2008. Diamondville is very much a derivative of Silverthorne with faster FSB.

Key features:

  • 32-bit
  • 1 Core / 2 Threads
  • FSB 533 MHz - 667 MHz
  • Cache
    • 32 KB L1i$ / 23 KB L1d$ (per core)
    • 512 KB L2$ (per core)
    • No L3$