Semiconductor & Computer Engineering
From WikiChip
Difference between revisions of "Talk:amd/microarchitectures/zen"
(→Additional numbers: new section) |
(→neural network: new section) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
--[[User:ChipIt|ChipIt]] ([[User talk:ChipIt|talk]]) 18:13, 6 February 2017 (EST) | --[[User:ChipIt|ChipIt]] ([[User talk:ChipIt|talk]]) 18:13, 6 February 2017 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == neural network == | ||
| + | |||
| + | seriously what's up with AMD calling their hash perceptron predictor a "neural network predictor" all the sudden? Sure it's a NN, but common! they've been using that for YEARS. Nothing has changed. And all those review sites are running with it like are working for AMD's own marketing department (even Wikipedia). Like it's some kind of a new revolutionary thing. lol --[[User:David|David]] ([[User talk:David|talk]]) 14:35, 2 May 2017 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:35, 2 May 2017
| This is the discussion page for the amd/microarchitectures/zen page. |
|
Additional numbers
Given we have a source in the know, here are some additional numbers we posted that might require double-checking once Zen is fully published:
- instruction byte buffer -> 20 x 16B
- Op cache -> 2K instructions
- 8 inst/cycle
Other numbers that obtained were corroborated by AMD already so I've left them out.
--ChipIt (talk) 18:13, 6 February 2017 (EST)
neural network
seriously what's up with AMD calling their hash perceptron predictor a "neural network predictor" all the sudden? Sure it's a NN, but common! they've been using that for YEARS. Nothing has changed. And all those review sites are running with it like are working for AMD's own marketing department (even Wikipedia). Like it's some kind of a new revolutionary thing. lol --David (talk) 14:35, 2 May 2017 (EDT)
