Semiconductor & Computer Engineering
From WikiChip
Difference between revisions of "Talk:intel/tick-tock"
(Created page with "{{talk header}}") |
(→Name for first tick from Core really Penryn?) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talk header}} | {{talk header}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Name for first tick from Core really Penryn? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Suddenly I'm wondering if Penryn was the name for the tick that followed the Core microarchitecture, since Penryn was the mobile version, while Wolfdale was the desktop version. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[WikiChip:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Mganai|Mganai]] ([[User talk:Mganai|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mganai|contribs]]) 02:39, Dec 13 2017 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::The table consists of what Intel called their microarchitecture. Based on that, Intel called Penryn a "tick". See the slides at the bottom of the article. That being said "Wolfdale" is just a processor core based on the Penryn microarchitecture. Hope that clarifies. --[[User:At32Hz|At32Hz]] ([[User talk:At32Hz|talk]]) 21:43, 12 December 2017 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:43, 12 December 2017
| This is the discussion page for the intel/tick-tock page. |
|
Name for first tick from Core really Penryn?[edit]
Suddenly I'm wondering if Penryn was the name for the tick that followed the Core microarchitecture, since Penryn was the mobile version, while Wolfdale was the desktop version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mganai (talk • contribs) 02:39, Dec 13 2017 (UTC)
- The table consists of what Intel called their microarchitecture. Based on that, Intel called Penryn a "tick". See the slides at the bottom of the article. That being said "Wolfdale" is just a processor core based on the Penryn microarchitecture. Hope that clarifies. --At32Hz (talk) 21:43, 12 December 2017 (EST)