From WikiChip
Editing intel/mesh interconnect architecture

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

This page supports semantic in-text annotations (e.g. "[[Is specified as::World Heritage Site]]") to build structured and queryable content provided by Semantic MediaWiki. For a comprehensive description on how to use annotations or the #ask parser function, please have a look at the getting started, in-text annotation, or inline queries help pages.

Latest revision Your text
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
== History ==
 
== History ==
Since the late 2000s, Intel has used a {{intel|ring interconnect architecture}} in order to interconnect multiple [[physical cores]] together efficiently. Throughout the 2010s as the number of cores on Intel's high-end models continue to increase, the ring reached fairly problematic scaling issues, particularly in the area of bandwidth and latency. To significantly mitigate those bottlenecks, Intel introduced a new mesh interconnect architecture which implemented a mesh networking topology in order to reduce the latency between nodes and increase the bandwidth.
+
Since the late 2000s, Intel has used a {{intel|ring interconnect architecture}} in order to interconnect multiple [[physical cores]] together efficiently. Throughout the 2010s as the number of cores on Intel's high-end models continue to increase, the ring reached fairly problematic scaling issues, particularly in the area of bandwidth and latency. To significant mitigate those bottlenecks, Intel introduced a new mesh interconnect architecture which implemented a mesh networking topology in order to reduce the latency between nodes and increase the bandwidth.
  
 
Intel has been experimenting with mesh topologies for a very long time in their research projects. For example, the 80 [[many-core]] {{intel|Polaris|l=arch}} processor from [[2007]] featured a mesh interconnect architecture with a 5-port router on each tile. Polaris was the very first research chip in the area of teraFLOP computing which eventually resulted in the {{intel|Xeon Phi}} family of commercial processors. In June [[2016]], Intel launched new {{intel|Xeon Phi}} {{intel|mic architecture|MIC}} microprocessors based on {{intel|Knights Landing|l=arch}} which was Intel's first commercialized microarchitecture to implement the new interconnect architecture. In mid-[[2017]] Intel launched the {{intel|Skylake (server)|Skylake server microarchitecture|l=arch}} which featured also featured the mesh interconnect. This microarchitecture is found in their server ({{intel|Xeon Scalable}}) microprocessors and the {{intel|Core i7}} and {{intel|Core i9}} HEDT parts.
 
Intel has been experimenting with mesh topologies for a very long time in their research projects. For example, the 80 [[many-core]] {{intel|Polaris|l=arch}} processor from [[2007]] featured a mesh interconnect architecture with a 5-port router on each tile. Polaris was the very first research chip in the area of teraFLOP computing which eventually resulted in the {{intel|Xeon Phi}} family of commercial processors. In June [[2016]], Intel launched new {{intel|Xeon Phi}} {{intel|mic architecture|MIC}} microprocessors based on {{intel|Knights Landing|l=arch}} which was Intel's first commercialized microarchitecture to implement the new interconnect architecture. In mid-[[2017]] Intel launched the {{intel|Skylake (server)|Skylake server microarchitecture|l=arch}} which featured also featured the mesh interconnect. This microarchitecture is found in their server ({{intel|Xeon Scalable}}) microprocessors and the {{intel|Core i7}} and {{intel|Core i9}} HEDT parts.

Please note that all contributions to WikiChip may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see WikiChip:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)