Semiconductor & Computer Engineering
From WikiChip
Difference between revisions of "Talk:amd/athlon/3000g"
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| − | :: | + | ::Allright, I didn't know that. But, are we sure? Because the B1 vs B0 stepping, isn't that just a character string that's embedded in the processor that AMD can change into whatever they like at production? I mean, either the stepping is wrong or doesn't tell us what it should, or it's the 14nm mentioned on the AMD website that is wrong. I've seen a couple of reviews saying it's basically an unlocked 200GE. There are also pictures of a delidded 3000G, and it looks like a smaller die than Raven Ridge. See here: https://mobile.twitter.com/momomo_us/status/1199354469227487232 Many thanks for a great website btw! |
Revision as of 09:06, 28 November 2019
| This is the discussion page for the amd/athlon/3000g page. |
|
Tried to edit this one repeatedly. The name 3000G implies a 12nm Picasso chip, but in reality it is a 14nm Raven Ridge chip. See the AMD spec for this: https://www.amd.com/en/products/apu/amd-athlon-3000g
It says it right there, it's 14nm so it can only be Raven Ridge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.174.168.130 (talk • contribs)
- That's wrong, and the AMD website is wrong. The 3000G is 12nm Picasso and uses B1 stepping, not 14nm Raven Ridge (B0 stepping). --David (talk) 12:58, 27 November 2019 (EST)
- Allright, I didn't know that. But, are we sure? Because the B1 vs B0 stepping, isn't that just a character string that's embedded in the processor that AMD can change into whatever they like at production? I mean, either the stepping is wrong or doesn't tell us what it should, or it's the 14nm mentioned on the AMD website that is wrong. I've seen a couple of reviews saying it's basically an unlocked 200GE. There are also pictures of a delidded 3000G, and it looks like a smaller die than Raven Ridge. See here: https://mobile.twitter.com/momomo_us/status/1199354469227487232 Many thanks for a great website btw!
