Semiconductor & Computer Engineering
From WikiChip
Difference between revisions of "Talk:intel/microarchitectures/goldmont plus"
(→16 GiB?) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:: It doesn't look like it, although we won't know for sure until products are launched. But historically, neither {{intel|Apollo Lake|l=core}} nor {{intel|Braswell|l=core}} supported 16 GiB. Both only supported up to 8 GiB. --[[User:David|David]] ([[User talk:David|talk]]) 12:56, 3 August 2017 (EDT) | :: It doesn't look like it, although we won't know for sure until products are launched. But historically, neither {{intel|Apollo Lake|l=core}} nor {{intel|Braswell|l=core}} supported 16 GiB. Both only supported up to 8 GiB. --[[User:David|David]] ([[User talk:David|talk]]) 12:56, 3 August 2017 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I say it because websites are reporting it as such: "Intel has also upped the memory support for the single 64bit DDR4 controller. Higher speeds are available and maximum system memory is increased to 16 GB from 8 GB" | ||
Latest revision as of 14:27, 3 August 2017
| This is the discussion page for the intel/microarchitectures/goldmont plus page. |
|
16 GiB?[edit]
Doesn't Goldmont Plus support up to 16 Gib? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.46.235.204 (talk • contribs)
- It doesn't look like it, although we won't know for sure until products are launched. But historically, neither Apollo Lake nor Braswell supported 16 GiB. Both only supported up to 8 GiB. --David (talk) 12:56, 3 August 2017 (EDT)
I say it because websites are reporting it as such: "Intel has also upped the memory support for the single 64bit DDR4 controller. Higher speeds are available and maximum system memory is increased to 16 GB from 8 GB"