From WikiChip
Difference between revisions of "User talk:At32Hz"

(Goldmont)
m (Goldmont)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
?> Hello World! <?
 
?> Hello World! <?
  
"14nm lithography article" You reverted my edit about the sram density, while the Intel slide in the article clearly states that the sram density is higher than that of a logic tall cell. So do you claim the slide is wrong, or do i miss something obvious.
+
"14nm lithography article" You reverted my edit about the sram density, while the Intel slide in the article clearly states that the sram density is higher than that of a logic tall cell. So do you claim the slide is wrong, or do i miss something obvious?
  
  

Revision as of 16:02, 20 July 2017

Goldmont

?> Hello World! <?

"14nm lithography article" You reverted my edit about the sram density, while the Intel slide in the article clearly states that the sram density is higher than that of a logic tall cell. So do you claim the slide is wrong, or do i miss something obvious?


Re "Goldmont" article. You stuffed all my edits under "latency", even though most of them are about throughput. Throughput != latency. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.175.37.10 (talkcontribs)


Yup my bad. It should've been throughput. I've changed it accordingly. --At32Hz (talk) 09:51, 27 October 2016 (EDT)