Semiconductor & Computer Engineering
From WikiChip
Difference between revisions of "User talk:At32Hz"
(→Goldmont) |
(→Goldmont) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Goldmont == | == Goldmont == | ||
?> Hello World! <? | ?> Hello World! <? | ||
| + | |||
| + | "14nm lithography article" You reverted my edit about the sram density, while the Intel slide in the article clearly states that the sram density is higher than that of a logic tall cell. So do you claim the slide is wrong, or do i miss something obvious. | ||
| + | |||
Re "Goldmont" article. You stuffed all my edits under "latency", even though most of them are about throughput. Throughput != latency. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[WikiChip:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:213.175.37.10|213.175.37.10]] ([[User talk:213.175.37.10|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/213.175.37.10|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | Re "Goldmont" article. You stuffed all my edits under "latency", even though most of them are about throughput. Throughput != latency. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[WikiChip:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:213.175.37.10|213.175.37.10]] ([[User talk:213.175.37.10|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/213.175.37.10|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | ||
Revision as of 17:02, 20 July 2017
Goldmont
?> Hello World! <?
"14nm lithography article" You reverted my edit about the sram density, while the Intel slide in the article clearly states that the sram density is higher than that of a logic tall cell. So do you claim the slide is wrong, or do i miss something obvious.
Re "Goldmont" article. You stuffed all my edits under "latency", even though most of them are about throughput. Throughput != latency. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.175.37.10 (talk • contribs)
- Yup my bad. It should've been throughput. I've changed it accordingly. --At32Hz (talk) 09:51, 27 October 2016 (EDT)
