From WikiChip
Difference between revisions of "Talk:WikiChip"
(→add the legacy/historical ICs back after new design: new section) |
(→Zgryrtyrty yhhf gsgkjl ftfd gsgsg s: new section) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
We should add the old/legacy/historical ICs back into the front page. I not really sure what should be the best organization and layout for them. Any thoughts? --[[User:ChipIt|ChipIt]] ([[User talk:ChipIt|talk]]) 18:49, 7 January 2017 (EST) | We should add the old/legacy/historical ICs back into the front page. I not really sure what should be the best organization and layout for them. Any thoughts? --[[User:ChipIt|ChipIt]] ([[User talk:ChipIt|talk]]) 18:49, 7 January 2017 (EST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Zgryrtyrty yhhf gsgkjl ftfd gsgsg s == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Zhheherhrh eg egemtr hrggwe wes egemtrghdfbsgd rwtwrqw |
Revision as of 18:39, 26 February 2017
This is the discussion page for the WikiChip page. |
|
Looking to contribute?
Contents
Discussions are welcome
Hey everyone!
Let's do this first discussion. The site design, I'm loving it. So far, I like the simplicity, and I think everything looks fairly amazing.
Thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zmodem (talk • contribs)
New layout
New main page draft design layout has been created here WikiChip:Main Page. --Jonathan (talk) 18:49, 1 December 2015 (EST)
- Im attempting to add the chip families on the right column and move the electrical concepts to below the digital box. I think that's a slightly better organization --Inject (talk) 13:42, 5 January 2016 (EST)
add the legacy/historical ICs back after new design
We should add the old/legacy/historical ICs back into the front page. I not really sure what should be the best organization and layout for them. Any thoughts? --ChipIt (talk) 18:49, 7 January 2017 (EST)
Zgryrtyrty yhhf gsgkjl ftfd gsgsg s
Zhheherhrh eg egemtr hrggwe wes egemtrghdfbsgd rwtwrqw