From WikiChip
Difference between revisions of "Talk:intel/microarchitectures/broadwell (client)"
(→dubious intel statement on scheduler size) |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Also the instruction queue is increased from 2x20 to 2x25, but [citation needed] I guess, can't find it anymore :) --[[Special:Contributions/195.241.129.245|195.241.129.245]] 01:39, 18 July 2016 (EDT) | Also the instruction queue is increased from 2x20 to 2x25, but [citation needed] I guess, can't find it anymore :) --[[Special:Contributions/195.241.129.245|195.241.129.245]] 01:39, 18 July 2016 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | : ah thanks! so it did increase to 64 entries. I will update the diagram accordingly. Intel sure doesn't make that info easy to come by. -[[User:At32Hz|At32Hz]] ([[User talk:At32Hz|talk]]) 11:43, 18 July 2016 (EDT) |
Revision as of 10:44, 18 July 2016
This is the discussion page for the intel/microarchitectures/broadwell (client) page. |
|
dubious intel statement on scheduler size
According to the Intel presentation slides, they have "Larger out-of-order scheduler" but what's not clear is what they meant by that. The ROB seems to remain at 192 entries. Scheduler is still at 60 entries. Or am I missing something? --At32Hz (talk) 16:20, 14 April 2016 (EDT)
Source for scheduler size increase
Intel source for the increase in scheduler from 60 to 64: https://intel.lanyonevents.com/sz15/connect/fileDownload/session/ECA57E7DBF19B1A610382EB5ABF2B651/SZ15_ARCS001_100_ENGf.pdf slide 21
Also the instruction queue is increased from 2x20 to 2x25, but [citation needed] I guess, can't find it anymore :) --195.241.129.245 01:39, 18 July 2016 (EDT)