Semiconductor & Computer Engineering
From WikiChip
Difference between revisions of "User talk:At32Hz"
m (→Goldmont) |
(moved discussion to its own section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Goldmont == | == Goldmont == | ||
?> Hello World! <? | ?> Hello World! <? | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Re "Goldmont" article. You stuffed all my edits under "latency", even though most of them are about throughput. Throughput != latency. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[WikiChip:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:213.175.37.10|213.175.37.10]] ([[User talk:213.175.37.10|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/213.175.37.10|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | Re "Goldmont" article. You stuffed all my edits under "latency", even though most of them are about throughput. Throughput != latency. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[WikiChip:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:213.175.37.10|213.175.37.10]] ([[User talk:213.175.37.10|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/213.175.37.10|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | ||
| Line 10: | Line 7: | ||
: Yup my bad. It should've been throughput. I've changed it accordingly. --[[User:At32Hz|At32Hz]] ([[User talk:At32Hz|talk]]) 09:51, 27 October 2016 (EDT) | : Yup my bad. It should've been throughput. I've changed it accordingly. --[[User:At32Hz|At32Hz]] ([[User talk:At32Hz|talk]]) 09:51, 27 October 2016 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == 14 nm == | ||
| + | "14nm lithography article" You reverted my edit about the sram density, while the Intel slide in the article clearly states that the sram density is higher than that of a logic tall cell. So do you claim the slide is wrong, or do i miss something obvious? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[WikiChip:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Nible|Nible]] ([[User talk:Nible|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nible|contribs]]) 09:20, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | ||
Revision as of 18:00, 20 July 2017
Goldmont
?> Hello World! <?
Re "Goldmont" article. You stuffed all my edits under "latency", even though most of them are about throughput. Throughput != latency. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.175.37.10 (talk • contribs)
- Yup my bad. It should've been throughput. I've changed it accordingly. --At32Hz (talk) 09:51, 27 October 2016 (EDT)
14 nm
"14nm lithography article" You reverted my edit about the sram density, while the Intel slide in the article clearly states that the sram density is higher than that of a logic tall cell. So do you claim the slide is wrong, or do i miss something obvious? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nible (talk • contribs) 09:20, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)