From WikiChip
Difference between revisions of "Talk:intel/microarchitectures/broadwell (client)"
(→dubious intel statement on scheduler size: new section) |
(→dubious intel statement on scheduler size) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
According to the Intel presentation slides, they have "Larger out-of-order scheduler" but what's not clear is what they meant by that. The ROB seems to remain at 192 entries. Scheduler is still at 60 entries. Or am I missing something? --[[User:At32Hz|At32Hz]] ([[User talk:At32Hz|talk]]) 16:20, 14 April 2016 (EDT) | According to the Intel presentation slides, they have "Larger out-of-order scheduler" but what's not clear is what they meant by that. The ROB seems to remain at 192 entries. Scheduler is still at 60 entries. Or am I missing something? --[[User:At32Hz|At32Hz]] ([[User talk:At32Hz|talk]]) 16:20, 14 April 2016 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | It's increased to 64. I can't find the original Intel source, but its reflected here: | ||
+ | https://www.microway.com/knowledge-center-articles/detailed-specifications-of-the-intel-xeon-e5-2600v4-broadwell-ep-processors/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Also the instruction queue is increased from 2x20 to 2x25, but [citation needed] I guess, can't find it anymore :) |
Revision as of 14:53, 17 July 2016
This is the discussion page for the intel/microarchitectures/broadwell (client) page. |
|
dubious intel statement on scheduler size
According to the Intel presentation slides, they have "Larger out-of-order scheduler" but what's not clear is what they meant by that. The ROB seems to remain at 192 entries. Scheduler is still at 60 entries. Or am I missing something? --At32Hz (talk) 16:20, 14 April 2016 (EDT)
It's increased to 64. I can't find the original Intel source, but its reflected here:
https://www.microway.com/knowledge-center-articles/detailed-specifications-of-the-intel-xeon-e5-2600v4-broadwell-ep-processors/
Also the instruction queue is increased from 2x20 to 2x25, but [citation needed] I guess, can't find it anymore :)