Semiconductor & Computer Engineering
From WikiChip
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Mganai"
(→Issues with some changes) |
(→Issues with some changes) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
--[[User:At32Hz|At32Hz]] ([[User talk:At32Hz|talk]]) 22:56, 13 November 2017 (EST) | --[[User:At32Hz|At32Hz]] ([[User talk:At32Hz|talk]]) 22:56, 13 November 2017 (EST) | ||
| − | * You're right. Didn't realize SB-DT really did refer to Xeon E3. I just remember Haswell-DT referring to desktop Haswell, unless wikipedia was wrong somehow. Anyways, we still have work to do on these pages. What say you about splitting between desktop and mobile parts on the chip tables? --[[ | + | * You're right. Didn't realize SB-DT really did refer to Xeon E3. I just remember Haswell-DT referring to desktop Haswell, unless wikipedia was wrong somehow. Anyways, we still have work to do on these pages. What say you about splitting between desktop and mobile parts on the chip tables? --[[User:Mganai|Mganai]] ([[User talk:Mganai|talk]]) 23:32, 13 November 2017 (EST)-- |
Revision as of 23:32, 13 November 2017
Issues with some changes
You've made some changes I want to discuss.
- The first one is this. Sandy Bridge DT refers to Bromolow platform which eventually end up being marketed as Entry 1S Xeon E3 parts. See this roadmap.
- The second one is Kaby Lake R. Since Intel considers it a refresh of Kaby Lake, we also consider it part of the Kaby Lake microarchitecture. In the "succession" category we usually keep microarchitectures and "core names" separate. With that respect "R" succeeds "U" (both being a derivative of the Kaby Lake microarchitecture).
--At32Hz (talk) 22:56, 13 November 2017 (EST)
- You're right. Didn't realize SB-DT really did refer to Xeon E3. I just remember Haswell-DT referring to desktop Haswell, unless wikipedia was wrong somehow. Anyways, we still have work to do on these pages. What say you about splitting between desktop and mobile parts on the chip tables? --Mganai (talk) 23:32, 13 November 2017 (EST)--