Semiconductor & Computer Engineering
From WikiChip
Difference between revisions of "Talk:intel/microarchitectures/goldmont plus"
(Bot: creating talk page) |
(→16 GiB?) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talk header}} | {{talk header}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | == 16 GiB? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Doesn't Goldmont Plus support up to 16 Gib? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[WikiChip:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:83.46.235.204|83.46.235.204]] ([[User talk:83.46.235.204|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/83.46.235.204|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: It doesn't look like it, although we won't know for sure until products are launched. But historically, neither {{intel|Apollo Lake|l=core}} nor {{intel|Braswell|l=core}} supported 16 GiB. Both only supported up to 8 GiB. --[[User:David|David]] ([[User talk:David|talk]]) 12:56, 3 August 2017 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I say it because websites are reporting it as such: "Intel has also upped the memory support for the single 64bit DDR4 controller. Higher speeds are available and maximum system memory is increased to 16 GB from 8 GB" | ||
Latest revision as of 14:27, 3 August 2017
| This is the discussion page for the intel/microarchitectures/goldmont plus page. |
|
16 GiB?[edit]
Doesn't Goldmont Plus support up to 16 Gib? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.46.235.204 (talk • contribs)
- It doesn't look like it, although we won't know for sure until products are launched. But historically, neither Apollo Lake nor Braswell supported 16 GiB. Both only supported up to 8 GiB. --David (talk) 12:56, 3 August 2017 (EDT)
I say it because websites are reporting it as such: "Intel has also upped the memory support for the single 64bit DDR4 controller. Higher speeds are available and maximum system memory is increased to 16 GB from 8 GB"