From WikiChip
Difference between revisions of "File talk:intel 14nm+ (pmos).png"

(axes units required)
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Axes need their units labelled. X-axis is milliamps or microaps probably, while y-axis is either percentage/ratio or also micro/milliamps. --[[User:Darkstar|Darkstar]] ([[User talk:Darkstar|talk]]) 05:53, 31 March 2017 (EDT)
 
Axes need their units labelled. X-axis is milliamps or microaps probably, while y-axis is either percentage/ratio or also micro/milliamps. --[[User:Darkstar|Darkstar]] ([[User talk:Darkstar|talk]]) 05:53, 31 March 2017 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Absolutely right. Leakage current is your I<sub>OFF</sub> current which Intel measures in nA/µm vs. your drive current which is your I<sub>ON</sub> which is an order of magnitude bigger so mA/µm. A fairly substantial improvement to the drive current without worsening the leakage. I'll update the graph to include units later when I get a chance or if anyone else does it. --[[User:David|David]] ([[User talk:David|talk]]) 10:04, 31 March 2017 (EDT)
 +
 +
:: updated --[[User:Inject|Inject]] ([[User talk:Inject|talk]]) 05:02, 4 April 2017 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 04:02, 4 April 2017

Axes need their units labelled. X-axis is milliamps or microaps probably, while y-axis is either percentage/ratio or also micro/milliamps. --Darkstar (talk) 05:53, 31 March 2017 (EDT)

Absolutely right. Leakage current is your IOFF current which Intel measures in nA/µm vs. your drive current which is your ION which is an order of magnitude bigger so mA/µm. A fairly substantial improvement to the drive current without worsening the leakage. I'll update the graph to include units later when I get a chance or if anyone else does it. --David (talk) 10:04, 31 March 2017 (EDT)
updated --Inject (talk) 05:02, 4 April 2017 (EDT)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikichip.org/w/index.php?title=File_talk:intel_14nm%2B_(pmos).png&oldid=40792"