From WikiChip
Editing dec/process

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

This page supports semantic in-text annotations (e.g. "[[Is specified as::World Heritage Site]]") to build structured and queryable content provided by Semantic MediaWiki. For a comprehensive description on how to use annotations or the #ask parser function, please have a look at the getting started, in-text annotation, or inline queries help pages.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
{{dec title|Process Technology History}}
+
{{dec title|Process Technology}}
This article details details '''[[DEC]]'s [[semiconductor process technology]]''' history for research and posterity.
+
This article details details '''[[DEC]]'s [[Semiconductor Process Technology]]''' history for research and posterity.
  
 
The table below shows the history of DEC's process scaling. Values were taken from various DEC documents including historical presentations and journals, ISSCC papers, and IEDM papers. Note that while a great deal of effort was put into ensuring the accuracy of the values, some numbers vary to a small degree between DEC's own documents and therefore discrepancies may exist.
 
The table below shows the history of DEC's process scaling. Values were taken from various DEC documents including historical presentations and journals, ISSCC papers, and IEDM papers. Note that while a great deal of effort was put into ensuring the accuracy of the values, some numbers vary to a small degree between DEC's own documents and therefore discrepancies may exist.
  
 
== Timeline ==
 
== Timeline ==
High-performance CMOS process started at Digital's Hudson, Massachusetts foundry in the mid-1980s along with Digital's new CMOS VLSI microprocessor designs. Digital adopted a similar manufacturing strategy to Intel whereby scaling of feature sizes occurs along with their development of new generations of high-performance microprocessors. Digital continued to operate the Hudson fab until 1997.Fab-6 in Hudson, Mass was sold to [[Intel]] which consequently upgraded it for $800M to Intel's propiatery [[0.18 µm]] (see {{intel|Process|Intel's Process}}). Intel continued to operate the fab until late 2013 when they announced that it will be closing the Hudson Fab due to no longer meeting their requirements such as aging technology.
 
 
 
<div style="overflow-x: auto;" class="scrollable">
 
<div style="overflow-x: auto;" class="scrollable">
 
<table class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;">
 
<table class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;">
Line 46: Line 44:
 
{{dec proc tech |year=1994 |name=CMOS-5 |mlayers=4 |node=0.50 µm
 
{{dec proc tech |year=1994 |name=CMOS-5 |mlayers=4 |node=0.50 µm
 
   |archs=Alpha 21164, NVAX++
 
   |archs=Alpha 21164, NVAX++
   |a1=T<sub>ox</sub>        |d1=9 nm
+
   |a1=T<sub>ox</sub>        |d1=
   |a2=V<sub>dd</sub>        |d2=3.3 V
+
   |a2=L<sub>g</sub>          |d2=0.50 µm
  |a3=L<sub>g</sub>          |d3=0.50 µm     |a32=L<sub>eff</sub> |d32=0.365 µm
 
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{dec proc tech |year=1996 |name=CMOS-6 |mlayers=4 |node=0.35 µm
 
{{dec proc tech |year=1996 |name=CMOS-6 |mlayers=4 |node=0.35 µm
Line 59: Line 56:
 
   |a1=T<sub>ox</sub>        |d1=
 
   |a1=T<sub>ox</sub>        |d1=
 
}}
 
}}
<tr><td>1997</td><td colspan="8" style="text-align: left;">Changed ownership to Intel (see {{intel|Process|Intel's Process}})</td></tr>
+
<tr><td>1997</td><td colspan="8">Fab-6 in Hudson, Mass was sold to [[Intel]] which consequently upgraded it for $800M to Intel's propiatery [[0.18 µm]] (see {{intel|Process|Intel's Process}}).</td></tr>
<tr><td>2013</td><td colspan="8" style="text-align: left;">Intel announced that it will be closing the Hudson Fab due to dated technology.</td></tr>
+
<tr><td>2013</td><td colspan="8">In late 2013 Intel announced that it will be closing the Hudson Fab due to no longer meeting their requirements such as aging technology.</td></tr>
 
</table>
 
</table>
 
</div>
 
</div>

Please note that all contributions to WikiChip may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see WikiChip:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)