Semiconductor & Computer Engineering
From WikiChip
Difference between revisions of "Talk:fairchild/100k"
(→added section regarding how article is ENTIRELY wrong) |
(→added section regarding how article is ENTIRELY wrong) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:Well, the whole article is half a sentence, but you're right the 100K was a high-speed ELC logic family. Not a slice family. I'll update it in a bit. --[[User:ChipIt|ChipIt]] ([[User talk:ChipIt|talk]]) 03:21, 27 May 2017 (EDT) | :Well, the whole article is half a sentence, but you're right the 100K was a high-speed ELC logic family. Not a slice family. I'll update it in a bit. --[[User:ChipIt|ChipIt]] ([[User talk:ChipIt|talk]]) 03:21, 27 May 2017 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Hey guys, I'll need to do some digging to find an updated databook but Fairchild indeed released a handful of LSI ECL 100K chips for 8-bit slicing including buffers, shift register, and a basic 74181-style chip. There is a possibility they were branded differently as it was around the time National squired them in 87 or so. It's also possible they never had large availability. --[[User:Inject|Inject]] ([[User talk:Inject|talk]]) 05:12, 27 May 2017 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 04:12, 27 May 2017
| This is the discussion page for the fairchild/100k page. |
|
added section regarding how article is ENTIRELY wrong
The content of the page is ENTIRELY wrong.
The Motorola MC10800 family was an 8-bit bit-slice family.
The Fairchild F100K family was a comprehensive ECL logic family, with everything from gates to MSI, but (AFAIK) no 8-bit bit-slice parts. --Brouhaha (talk) 02:50, 27 May 2017 (EDT)
- Well, the whole article is half a sentence, but you're right the 100K was a high-speed ELC logic family. Not a slice family. I'll update it in a bit. --ChipIt (talk) 03:21, 27 May 2017 (EDT)
- Hey guys, I'll need to do some digging to find an updated databook but Fairchild indeed released a handful of LSI ECL 100K chips for 8-bit slicing including buffers, shift register, and a basic 74181-style chip. There is a possibility they were branded differently as it was around the time National squired them in 87 or so. It's also possible they never had large availability. --Inject (talk) 05:12, 27 May 2017 (EDT)