Semiconductor & Computer Engineering
From WikiChip
Editing WikiChip:frequently asked questions
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
This page supports semantic in-text annotations (e.g. "[[Is specified as::World Heritage Site]]") to build structured and queryable content provided by Semantic MediaWiki. For a comprehensive description on how to use annotations or the #ask parser function, please have a look at the getting started, in-text annotation, or inline queries help pages.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | = WikiChip FAQ = | |
| + | This page is work in progress. | ||
| + | __TOC__ | ||
| + | |||
| + | === What is WikiChip? === | ||
| + | WikiChip is a semantic computer engineering wiki. WikiChip's long term goal is to document every [[microprocessor]] model as well as the [[microarchitecture]] [[instruction set architecture|architecture]] and [[instruction set]] that it implements. We also try to address general computer-related topics, concepts, and methodologies. | ||
| + | |||
| + | === How do I get started? === | ||
| + | See [[WikiChip:welcome]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Why document obsolete chips? === | ||
| + | While they may be obsolete as far as real-world application is concerned. They are still a subject of great research and interest among researchers and hobbyists alike. The decisions engineers made back in those early days of microprocessors and microcontrollers have had direct impact on how we design and think about things today. Likewise many of the ISAs we use everyday (such as x86) can trace their roots to those early chips. | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Why document every processor including obscure/failed ones? === | ||
| + | There is a lot to learn about the design philosophies of different groups of engineers. There is just as much to learn by examining failed designs as by examining highly successful designs. If we choose to only document notable or mainstream designs and products we risk losing valuable knowledge and opening us up to the possibility of repeating these same mistakes. | ||