From WikiChip
Editing intel/microarchitectures/sandy bridge (client)
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
This page supports semantic in-text annotations (e.g. "[[Is specified as::World Heritage Site]]") to build structured and queryable content provided by Semantic MediaWiki. For a comprehensive description on how to use annotations or the #ask parser function, please have a look at the getting started, in-text annotation, or inline queries help pages.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 317: | Line 317: | ||
[[File:sandy bridge ring flow.svg|right|275px]] | [[File:sandy bridge ring flow.svg|right|275px]] | ||
− | The four rings consists of a considerable amount of wiring and routing. Because the routing runs in the upper metal layers over the LLC, the rings have no real impact on die area. As with the LLC slices, the ring is fully pipelined and operates within the core's [[clock domain]] as it scales with the frequency of the core. The bandwidth of the ring also scales in bandwidth with each additional core/$slice pair that is added onto the ring, however with more cores the ring becomes more congested and adding latency as the average hop count increases. Intel expected the ring to support a fairly large amount of | + | The four rings consists of a considerable amount of wiring and routing. Because the routing runs in the upper metal layers over the LLC, the rings have no real impact on die area. As with the LLC slices, the ring is fully pipelined and operates within the core's [[clock domain]] as it scales with the frequency of the core. The bandwidth of the ring also scales in bandwidth with each additional core/$slice pair that is added onto the ring, however with more cores the ring becomes more congested and adding latency as the average hop count increases. Intel expected the ring to support a fairly large amount of core before facing real performance issues. |
It's important to note that the term ring refers to its structure and not necessarily how the data flows. The ring is not a round-robin and requests may travel up or down as needed. The use of address hashing allows the source agent to know exactly where the destination is. In order reduce latency, the ring is designed such as that all accesses on the ring always picks the shortest path. Because of this aspect of the ring and the fact that some requests can take longer than others to complete, the ring might have requests being handled out of order. It is the responsibility of the source agents to handle the ordering requirements. The ring [[cache coherency]] protocol is largely an enhancement based on Intel's {{intel|QuickPath Interconnect|QPI}} protocols with [[MESI]]-based source snooping protocol. On each cycle, the agents receive an indication whether there is an available slot on the ring for communication in the next cycle. When asserted, the agent can sent any type of communication (e.g. data or snoop) on the ring the following cycle. | It's important to note that the term ring refers to its structure and not necessarily how the data flows. The ring is not a round-robin and requests may travel up or down as needed. The use of address hashing allows the source agent to know exactly where the destination is. In order reduce latency, the ring is designed such as that all accesses on the ring always picks the shortest path. Because of this aspect of the ring and the fact that some requests can take longer than others to complete, the ring might have requests being handled out of order. It is the responsibility of the source agents to handle the ordering requirements. The ring [[cache coherency]] protocol is largely an enhancement based on Intel's {{intel|QuickPath Interconnect|QPI}} protocols with [[MESI]]-based source snooping protocol. On each cycle, the agents receive an indication whether there is an available slot on the ring for communication in the next cycle. When asserted, the agent can sent any type of communication (e.g. data or snoop) on the ring the following cycle. |
Facts about "Sandy Bridge (client) - Microarchitectures - Intel"
codename | Sandy Bridge (client) + |
core count | 2 + and 4 + |
designer | Intel + |
first launched | September 13, 2010 + |
full page name | intel/microarchitectures/sandy bridge (client) + |
instance of | microarchitecture + |
instruction set architecture | x86-64 + |
manufacturer | Intel + |
microarchitecture type | CPU + |
name | Sandy Bridge (client) + |
phase-out | November 2012 + |
pipeline stages (max) | 19 + |
pipeline stages (min) | 14 + |
process | 32 nm (0.032 μm, 3.2e-5 mm) + |