From WikiChip
Editing intel/mcs-8

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

This page supports semantic in-text annotations (e.g. "[[Is specified as::World Heritage Site]]") to build structured and queryable content provided by Semantic MediaWiki. For a comprehensive description on how to use annotations or the #ask parser function, please have a look at the getting started, in-text annotation, or inline queries help pages.

Latest revision Your text
Line 29: Line 29:
 
== History ==
 
== History ==
 
{{see also|ti/tmx1795|l1=TMX-1795}}
 
{{see also|ti/tmx1795|l1=TMX-1795}}
By mid 1969 [[Datapoint Corporation]], then Computer Terminal Corporation (CTC),  was looking to create a more powerful machine. Convinced this could be achieved by creating a more complex integrated circuit, CTC commissioned [[Intel]]. [[Texas Instruments]] was also brought in as a possible alternative. Intel had a working specs for the {{\|8008}} (also known as '''1201''') by January or February of 1970. The chip was planned to be center of CTC's [[Datapoint 2200]]. Later the same year, TI's own {{ti|TMX1795}} prototype which was based on Intel's own specs was send to CTC. CTC rejected it shortly after due to various design bugs. CTC eventually scrapped the 1201 idea entirely and went with a discrete [[transistor-transistor logic|TTL]] instead.
+
By mid 1969 [[Datapoint Corporation]], then Computer Terminal Corporation (CTC),  was looking to create a more powerful machine. Convinced this could be achieved by creating a more complex integrated circuit, CTC commissioned [[Intel]]. [[Texas Instruments]] was also brought in as a possible alternative. Intel had a working specs for the 8008 (also known as '''1201''') by January or February of 1970. The chip was planned to be center of CTC's [[Datapoint 2200]]. Later the same year, TI's own {{ti|TMX1795}} prototype which was based on Intel's own specs was send to CTC. CTC rejected it shortly after due to various design bugs. CTC eventually scrapped the 1201 idea entirely and went with a discrete [[transistor-transistor logic|TTL]] instead.
  
 
Following a slight redesign in 1971 with the help of Federico Faggin (the designer of the {{intel|4004}}), the modified chip was once again delivered to CTC. By that time CTC had moved on entirely onto the [[Datapoint 2200 II]]. The 1201 was no longer adequate for their product. CTC decided to abandon the 1201 idea, leaving the design's intellectual property to Intel. Intel renamed the 1201 {{\|8008}} which end up being hugely successful.
 
Following a slight redesign in 1971 with the help of Federico Faggin (the designer of the {{intel|4004}}), the modified chip was once again delivered to CTC. By that time CTC had moved on entirely onto the [[Datapoint 2200 II]]. The 1201 was no longer adequate for their product. CTC decided to abandon the 1201 idea, leaving the design's intellectual property to Intel. Intel renamed the 1201 {{\|8008}} which end up being hugely successful.

Please note that all contributions to WikiChip may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see WikiChip:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)
Facts about "MCS-8 - Intel"
designerIntel +, Ted Hoff +, Stan Mazor +, Hal Feeney + and Federico Faggin +
full page nameintel/mcs-8 +
instance ofmicroprocessor family +
instruction set architecture8008 +
main designerIntel +
manufacturerIntel +
nameIntel MCS-8 +
packageDIP18 +
process10,000 nm (10 μm, 0.01 mm) +
technologypMOS +
word size8 bit (1 octets, 2 nibbles) +