From WikiChip
Difference between revisions of "Template talk:main/chips"

(Created page with "Rather than basing the list on implementing company it seems likely that grouping by ISA family would be more useful, avoiding artificial splits.")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Rather than basing the list on implementing company it seems likely that grouping by ISA family would be more useful, avoiding artificial splits.
+
{{talk header}}
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Rather than basing the list on implementing company it seems likely that grouping by ISA family would be more useful, avoiding artificial splits. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[WikiChip:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Paul A. Clayton|Paul A. Clayton]] ([[User talk:Paul A. Clayton|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Paul A. Clayton|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
 +
 
 +
: That sounds good. I was thinking on re-arranging it the same way. One thing I was trying to decide is how much granularity do we want (ISA revisions? companies). There are many many less known companies (they are slowly getting added here [[list of microprocessor families]]). Do we really want to list them all or just put the major players on the front page and link to the full list on a separate page? --[[User:David|David]] ([[User talk:David|talk]]) 16:20, 5 September 2016 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:20, 5 September 2016

This is the discussion page for the main/chips page.
  • Please use this page to discuss possible errors, inconsistencies, omissions, changes, and further clarifications regarding the content of main/chips.
  • If you are looking for a particular model that's missing, please add its name to this page.


Rather than basing the list on implementing company it seems likely that grouping by ISA family would be more useful, avoiding artificial splits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul A. Clayton (talkcontribs)

That sounds good. I was thinking on re-arranging it the same way. One thing I was trying to decide is how much granularity do we want (ISA revisions? companies). There are many many less known companies (they are slowly getting added here list of microprocessor families). Do we really want to list them all or just put the major players on the front page and link to the full list on a separate page? --David (talk) 16:20, 5 September 2016 (EDT)