Editing Template talk:main/chips

{{talk header}}


== Change layout ==

Rather than basing the list on implementing company it seems likely that grouping by ISA family would be more useful, avoiding artificial splits. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[WikiChip:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Paul A. Clayton|Paul A. Clayton]] ([[User talk:Paul A. Clayton|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Paul A. Clayton|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

: That sounds good. I was thinking on re-arranging it the same way just haven't found the time (there are dozens of items missing as well). One thing I was trying to decide is how much granularity do we want (ISA revisions? companies). There are many many less known companies (they are slowly getting added here [[list of microprocessor families]]). Do we really want to list them all or just put the major players on the front page and link to the full list on a separate page? --[[User:David|David]] ([[User talk:David|talk]]) 16:20, 5 September 2016 (EDT)
Latest revision		Your text
Line 7:		Line 7:

	: That sounds good. I was thinking on re-arranging it the same way just haven't found the time (there are dozens of items missing as well). One thing I was trying to decide is how much granularity do we want (ISA revisions? companies). There are many many less known companies (they are slowly getting added here [[list of microprocessor families]]). Do we really want to list them all or just put the major players on the front page and link to the full list on a separate page? --[[User:David\|David]] ([[User talk:David\|talk]]) 16:20, 5 September 2016 (EDT)		: That sounds good. I was thinking on re-arranging it the same way just haven't found the time (there are dozens of items missing as well). One thing I was trying to decide is how much granularity do we want (ISA revisions? companies). There are many many less known companies (they are slowly getting added here [[list of microprocessor families]]). Do we really want to list them all or just put the major players on the front page and link to the full list on a separate page? --[[User:David\|David]] ([[User talk:David\|talk]]) 16:20, 5 September 2016 (EDT)
−
−	:: Would it be better to just break this large box into a number of smaller ones, each box its own ISA. And then maybe another box for "all other" including the ones that do not even implement an ISA (e.g. all the [[BSM]]s) --[[User:At32Hz\|At32Hz]] ([[User talk:At32Hz\|talk]]) 16:58, 8 September 2016 (EDT)