Editing Talk:intel/mcs-4/4004

{{talk header}}

== Microsystems International Limited ==

Based in Kanata, Ontario (suburb of Ottawa) MIL had purchased intel's process and contained the mask set for a number of their production parts. I know they had the 1103 and the masks for intel's 64 bit static RAM. I can not remember if MIL had the rights to produce the 4004 but I suspect they did and therefore should also be listed as selling it.

I do know they built an enhanced 4004 called the MF7112. Waiting on the shelves for a working version of their 4 bit processor was an emulator, text editor, and assembler for that machine, (and I think a mini-BIOS/OS) all written in Fortran by Larry Schweizer and his team of programmers, including John Heckman. I was there in Fall '72 and Spring '73 while they were working on the MF7112.

Sorry, I can not definitively say if MIL produced the 4004 but IMHO, the odds that it did not are low. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[WikiChip:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:73.193.100.92|73.193.100.92]] ([[User talk:73.193.100.92|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/73.193.100.92|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

:I added the MicroSystems International's MF7114 to the list. I think you mean MF7114 instead of MF7112? (going by [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5255182 this paper]). However after some investigating I found out that in the Electronic Products Magazine - [https://books.google.com/books?id=e6YpAQAAMAAJ&q=MF7112 Volume 16, Issues 7-12 it actually mentions a "MF7112"] (however Google doesn't let me view the entire page so I can't tell what's the chip actually is. So I'm wondering, is the IEEE paper got the number wrong or is the MF7112 simply a different chip. If you have some information/docs you can drop by here it would be pretty awesome. --[[User:ChipIt|ChipIt]] ([[User talk:ChipIt|talk]]) 03:04, 29 April 2016 (EDT)
Latest revision		Your text
Line 10:		Line 10:

	:I added the MicroSystems International's MF7114 to the list. I think you mean MF7114 instead of MF7112? (going by [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5255182 this paper]). However after some investigating I found out that in the Electronic Products Magazine - [https://books.google.com/books?id=e6YpAQAAMAAJ&q=MF7112 Volume 16, Issues 7-12 it actually mentions a "MF7112"] (however Google doesn't let me view the entire page so I can't tell what's the chip actually is. So I'm wondering, is the IEEE paper got the number wrong or is the MF7112 simply a different chip. If you have some information/docs you can drop by here it would be pretty awesome. --[[User:ChipIt\|ChipIt]] ([[User talk:ChipIt\|talk]]) 03:04, 29 April 2016 (EDT)		:I added the MicroSystems International's MF7114 to the list. I think you mean MF7114 instead of MF7112? (going by [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5255182 this paper]). However after some investigating I found out that in the Electronic Products Magazine - [https://books.google.com/books?id=e6YpAQAAMAAJ&q=MF7112 Volume 16, Issues 7-12 it actually mentions a "MF7112"] (however Google doesn't let me view the entire page so I can't tell what's the chip actually is. So I'm wondering, is the IEEE paper got the number wrong or is the MF7112 simply a different chip. If you have some information/docs you can drop by here it would be pretty awesome. --[[User:ChipIt\|ChipIt]] ([[User talk:ChipIt\|talk]]) 03:04, 29 April 2016 (EDT)
−
−	~~:: Follow-up the MF7114 was the processor and the MF7112 was the 4K DRAM (world's first commercial one actually). --[[User:ChipIt\|ChipIt]] ([[User talk:ChipIt\|talk]]) 06:09, 29 April 2016 (EDT)~~